![Pinterest](https://pinterest.com/pin/create/button/?url=http://en.dainikmohona.com/featured/cavinder-twins-take-issue-with-recent-story-describe-journalism-practice-as-blatant-sexist-trope/&media=http://en.dainikmohona.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Royals-City_images-10000-01-32.png&description="Shocking! Cavinder Twins Slam Sexist Story in Women's College Basketball. Find Out How They're Shattering Stereotypes & Inspiring Millions!){kind=link}
Contents
- 1 The Rising Profile of Hanna and Haley Cavinder in Women’s College Basketball
- 2 Unveiling the Story: “The NCAA Has a ‘Hot Girl’ Problem”
- 3 The Twins’ Claim of Misleading Interviews
- 4 Diminishing Athletic Achievements and Business Acumen
- 5 Support for Women in Media and Disapproval of Sexist Tropes
- 6 Author’s Silence and Editorial Response
The Rising Profile of Hanna and Haley Cavinder in Women’s College Basketball
Hanna Cavinder, one half of the talented Cavinder twins, recently took to her Twitter account to address a story that has caused quite a stir. The twins, who played a significant role in propelling the Miami Hurricanes to the Elite Eight in the women’s basketball tournament, have experienced a surge in their social media following, further solidifying their already prominent presence.
Unveiling the Story: “The NCAA Has a ‘Hot Girl’ Problem”
A story published in The Free Press shed light on the Cavinder twins, with a headline that read, “The NCAA Has a ‘Hot Girl’ Problem.” The sub-headline of the article, “The Cavinder Twins, the Emerging Oligarchs of Women’s College Basketball, Aren’t the Best Players. But They Might Be the Best-Looking,” delved into the twins’ appeal and their strategic use of social media to enhance their brand, leveraging the name, image, and likeness (NIL) opportunities presented in the college athletics landscape.
The Twins’ Claim of Misleading Interviews
Shortly after the story’s publication, Hanna Cavinder voiced her concerns, asserting that she and her sister had been misled during the interview process. In a statement, she clarified, “The interview for this article was obtained under false pretenses. We were promised that the focus would be on topics such as life after NIL, our decision not to take our fifth year, our passions, and business
opportunities.” Hanna expressed her disappointment, stating that they had been led to believe that the article would highlight their journey as vital figures in women’s college sports and as trailblazers in the realm of new media culture and business. She continued, “We welcomed this journalist into our home, spending an entire weekend answering his questions and providing insights into our daily lives. However, during the sit-down interview that lasted over an hour, we were only asked one question related to our physical appearance.”
Diminishing Athletic Achievements and Business Acumen
Hanna Cavinder expressed her dismay at the subsequent article, which not only undermined their athletic accomplishments and business endeavors but also perpetuated the notion that success for hardworking, creative, and driven women is contingent on their physical attractiveness. She highlighted the article’s failure to acknowledge their work ethic and dedication in navigating the NIL landscape and pursuing their business ventures. Additionally, she emphasized the impact they have on young girls and women who look up to them as role models and the responsibility they feel to inspire these individuals.
Support for Women in Media and Disapproval of Sexist Tropes
The Cavinder twins initially agreed to the interview in order to support a woman-led news outlet. However, they were left feeling disappointed and disgusted by what they perceived as journalistic misconduct and a blatant perpetuation of sexist stereotypes. Their primary goal is to inspire young women to pursue their dreams, work hard, and dare to dream big. They now find themselves in the position of defending these young women against men who seek to reduce their potential to mere physical appearance.
Author’s Silence and Editorial Response
Sherwood Strauss, the author of the controversial piece, has chosen not to respond to the criticism thus far. Bari Weiss, the editor of The Free Press, has described the story as a “great piece.”
In conclusion, the Cavinder twins’ disappointment with the article stems from their belief that it undermines their athletic achievements, disregards their business acumen, and perpetuates harmful stereotypes. Their intention to inspire young women remains unwavering, and they vow to continue championing the dreams and potential of all young women who aspire to greatness.